H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:33 UTC
Cristina Bucsa vs Donna Vekic H2H: 3-1
Cristina Bucsa holds a 3–1 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Cristina Bucsa leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cristina Bucsa won the 2026 Mérida third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | Mérida | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Cristina Bucsa | 6-3 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Cristina Bucsa | 6-2 6-4 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jul 2, 2025 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Cristina Bucsa | 6-1 6-3 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2023* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Donna Vekic | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Cristina Bucsa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Bucsa | #41 | #30 | 1,446 | 1,816 | 53 | 86 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #161 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #105 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #61 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2026 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #41 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |