H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Cristina Bucsa vs Kristina Mladenovic H2H: 2-0
Cristina Bucsa holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cristina Bucsa leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cristina Bucsa won the 2023 Guadalajara second round 6-0 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2023* | Guadalajara | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Cristina Bucsa | 6-0 6-0 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2022* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Cristina Bucsa | 6-4 7-6(3) | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cristina Bucsa | #41 | #30 | 1,446 | 1,816 | 53 | 86 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cristina Bucsa | Kristina Mladenovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #161 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #105 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2023 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #61 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2026 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #41 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |