H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Danka Kovinic vs Denisa Satralova H2H: 1-0
Danka Kovinic holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Satralova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2016 Miami first round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Denisa Satralova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denisa Satralova | #823 | #55 | 1,029 | 1,726 | 43 | 47 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danka Kovinic | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #108 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #62 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #130 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |