H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Danka Kovinic vs Yingying Duan H2H: 2-0
Danka Kovinic holds a 2–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Danka Kovinic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2016 Tianjin third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2016* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 6-4 6-3 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2015* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Danka Kovinic | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Danka Kovinic | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |