H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 0-2
Anett Kontaveit holds a 2–0 lead over Daria Kasatkina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2020 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2020* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 6-1 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
| Jul 6, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Anett Kontaveit | 6-3 6-2 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |