H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Daria Saville vs Julia Goerges H2H: 1-1
Daria Saville and Julia Goerges are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Wuhan second round 6-4 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2016 | Moscow | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Daria Saville | 7-5 6-1 | Julia Goerges | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daria Saville | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |