H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Daria Saville vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 2-1
Daria Saville holds a 2–1 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Daria Saville leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2018 Hong Kong third round 3-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 32
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2018* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Daria Saville | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Zarina Diyas | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2016* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Daria Saville | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | Zarina Diyas | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Zarina Diyas | 7-5 6-3 | Daria Saville | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Zarina Diyas | #437 | #31 | 1,495 | 1,751 | 99 | 127 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Saville | Zarina Diyas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #242 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #227 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #66 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #89 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #77 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #80 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #102 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |