Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Ana Bogdan H2H: 1-1
Dayana Yastremska and Ana Bogdan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ana Bogdan leads 1–0 on grass, while Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ana Bogdan won the 2022 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Bogdan | 6-2 6-2 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Jun 29, 2022* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Dayana Yastremska | 3-6 7-6(7) 7-6(7) | Ana Bogdan | Match data | Mar 3, 2022* | R32 | Lyon | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-2 6-4 | Ana Bogdan | Match data | Sep 28, 2018 | Q1 | China Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,798 | 82 | 114 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #76 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #56 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #114 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2015 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2017 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2018 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2019 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | 39 | 62 | 101 | 38.6% | 38 | 42 | 80 | 47.5% | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 183/192 of Ana Bogdan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2014 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 61.6% | 58.4% | 45.6% | 61.3% | 36.1% | 53.5% | 45.9% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | 2015 | 5/7 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 74.1% | 55.9% | 46.9% | 49.5% | 54.9% | 53.3% | 40.1% |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2016 | 12/12 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 68.5% | 60.0% | 41.4% | 54.0% | 47.0% | 53.8% | 45.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2017 | 14/14 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 59.5% | 64.0% | 46.9% | 57.1% | 49.8% | 57.3% | 41.6% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2018 | 28/29 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 60.9% | 61.6% | 46.7% | 55.1% | 42.6% | 55.9% | 42.5% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | 2019 | 18/18 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 60.0% | 58.6% | 49.3% | 50.0% | 40.2% | 55.0% | 41.5% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5/6 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 60.5% | 64.7% | 50.0% | 48.2% | 52.0% | 58.9% | 49.7% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24/25 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 62.5% | 61.2% | 47.4% | 41.7% | 48.1% | 56.2% | 45.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20/23 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 65.0% | 63.8% | 51.2% | 52.4% | 51.8% | 59.4% | 48.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 25/25 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 62.1% | 62.8% | 47.5% | 44.4% | 52.2% | 56.7% | 43.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 28/29 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 64.0% | 60.8% | 48.9% | 54.4% | 52.0% | 56.3% | 42.2% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 63.2% | 66.7% | 14.3% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 47.4% | 41.2% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 183/196 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 62.9% | 61.5% | 47.5% | 50.5% | 48.2% | 56.3% | 43.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2014 | 1498 | 96.8 | -1.96 | +1.78 | 0.987 | 49.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.60 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.10 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2015 | 1460 | 102.5 | -1.71 | -0.81 | 0.859 | 47.1% | — | +30 | — | 23.1% | -1.69 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2016 | 1553 | 111.0 | -1.05 | +0.82 | 0.972 | 49.4% | 0 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.14 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.44 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2017 | 1628 | 117.1 | +0.34 | -0.97 | 0.974 | 49.7% | +12 | -120 | — | 46.9% | -0.09 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.09 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.02 | 2018 | 1622 | 127.0 | -0.52 | -0.76 | 0.964 | 49.2% | +15 | -74 | — | 45.3% | -0.44 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.5 | -0.05 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -45 | +111 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 | 2019 | 1600 | 117.6 | -1.43 | -1.16 | 0.921 | 48.1% | -15 | -33 | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.9 | -1.05 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1589 | 111.9 | -1.15 | +1.83 | 1.207 | 53.8% | — | -16 | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.31 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1636 | 122.1 | -0.53 | +1.73 | 1.034 | 50.2% | -10 | -10 | — | 44.2% | -0.40 | 1–7 (13%) | 2–3 (40%) | 93.3 | +0.35 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1756 | 136.8 | +1.08 | +3.48 | 1.195 | 53.6% | -84 | +52 | — | 56.6% | +0.83 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–8 (27%) | 99.7 | -1.50 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1741 | 127.7 | -0.57 | +0.29 | 0.996 | 49.8% | -101 | +97 | -29 | 47.5% | -0.08 | 6–7 (46%) | 5–3 (63%) | 100.0 | +0.23 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1710 | 135.0 | -0.44 | -0.52 | 0.965 | 49.6% | -7 | +32 | — | 46.4% | -0.26 | 3–8 (27%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.6 | -1.16 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1604 | 110.1 | — | — | — | — | +97 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.89 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1591 | 98.6 | +0.32 | -1.13 | 0.782 | 43.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| Career | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.88 | — | 1798 | 129.3 | -0.47 | +0.37 | 1.001 | 49.9% | -14 | +2 | -29 | 45.2% | -0.25 | 25–45 (36%) | 21–33 (39%) | 87.4 | -1.53 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ana Bogdan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline Garcia | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jun 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 29, 2023 | H2H |
| Anastasija Sevastova | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Veronika Kudermetova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 17, 2024 | H2H |