H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Anna Kalinskaya H2H: 1-2
Anna Kalinskaya holds a 2–1 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anna Kalinskaya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Kalinskaya won the 2023 Rome first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Anna Kalinskaya | 6-4 6-2 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2021* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna Kalinskaya | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2017* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Dayana Yastremska | 6-1 6-4 | Anna Kalinskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Anna Kalinskaya | #20 | #11 | 2,975 | 1,957 | 134 | 122 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Anna Kalinskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #114 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #111 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,885 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #20 | 1,903 | 0 | 0 |