H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Bernarda Pera H2H: 1-1
Dayana Yastremska and Bernarda Pera are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bernarda Pera leads 1–0 on clay, while Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2020 Cincinnati third round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2020* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2018 | New Haven | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2018* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Bernarda Pera | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |