H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Daria Saville H2H: 1-3
Daria Saville holds a 3–1 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2024 Miami second round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2024* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 7-5 7-5 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| Jan 2, 2024* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Daria Saville | 6-0 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Daria Saville | 6-4 6-3 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daria Saville | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Daria Saville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |