H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Nadia Podoroska H2H: 1-1
Dayana Yastremska and Nadia Podoroska are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on grass, while Nadia Podoroska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Podoroska won the 2024 Beijing second round 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nadia Podoroska | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2024* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Dayana Yastremska | 6-1 7-6(1) | Nadia Podoroska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Nadia Podoroska | #471 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,762 | 53 | 78 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #84 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–24 | 29.4% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |