H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Satralova vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 1-0
Denisa Satralova holds a 1–0 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denisa Satralova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Satralova won the 2016 US Open first round 7-6(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 38
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Denisa Satralova | 7-6(4) 6-1 | Ana Ivanovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Satralova | #823 | #55 | 1,029 | 1,726 | 43 | 47 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ana Ivanovic | #63 | #1 | 6,912 | 2,095 | 419 | 213 | 66.3% | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Satralova | Ana Ivanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #4 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,975 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #108 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,825 | 1 | 8 |
| 22 | 2015 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #62 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #17 | 1,938 | 1 | 10 |
| 23 | 2016 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #22 | 1,877 | 1 | 11 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #130 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #13 | 1,872 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,855 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #5 | 2,019 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #16 | 1,857 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #63 | 1,702 | 1 | 15 |