H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Denisa Satralova vs Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic H2H: 1-0
Denisa Satralova holds a 1–0 lead over Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denisa Satralova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Satralova won the 2015 Guangzhou fourth round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2015* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Denisa Satralova | 6-3 7-6(5) | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Satralova | #823 | #55 | 1,029 | 1,726 | 43 | 47 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | #546 | #32 | 1,485 | 1,737 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Satralova | Bojana Jovanovski Petrovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #73 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #108 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2015 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #62 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #79 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #130 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #725 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,518 | 0 | 2 |