H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Diane Parry vs Chloe Paquet H2H: 1-1
Diane Parry and Chloe Paquet are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Diane Parry won the 2024 Palermo quarterfinal 7-5 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 23
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2024* | Palermo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Diane Parry | 7-5 1-6 6-4 | Chloe Paquet | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2022 | Rouen | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Chloe Paquet | 6-4 6-7(0) 6-1 | Diane Parry | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane Parry | #55 | #47 | 1,215 | 1,760 | 62 | 66 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chloe Paquet | #297 | #96 | 746 | 1,634 | 18 | 49 | 26.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diane Parry | Chloe Paquet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #112 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #164 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #157 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #123 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |