Diane Parry
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Clara Tauson | 3 | 0 | 3 | Aug 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Anhelina Kalinina | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 14, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Diane Parry vs Nadia Podoroska H2H: 1-0
Diane Parry holds a 1–0 lead over Nadia Podoroska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diane Parry leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diane Parry won the 2024 Paris Olympics first round 7-6(6) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane Parry | 7-6(6) 7-5 | Nadia Podoroska | Match data | Jul 29, 2024* | R64 | Paris Olympics | Olympics | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane Parry | #31 | #31 | 1,611 | 1,845 | 72 | 70 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Nadia Podoroska | #449 | #36 | 1,787 | 1,767 | 55 | 81 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diane Parry | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #63 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #304 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #31 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #47 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–25 | 28.6% | #100 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #471 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #449 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Diane Parry | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2019 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2020 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 40 | 37 | 77 | 51.9% | 22 | 25 | 47 | 46.8% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | 31 | 45 | 76 | 40.8% | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 133/143 of Diane Parry's and 131/135 of Nadia Podoroska's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Diane Parry | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2019 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 3.3 | 59.2% | 62.5% | 47.8% | 73.1% | 25.0% | 56.5% | 29.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 54.2% | 59.4% | 33.3% | 44.4% | 66.7% | 47.5% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 69.9% | 62.7% | 42.6% | 49.2% | 41.7% | 57.0% | 32.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 25/26 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 59.6% | 61.5% | 47.7% | 57.6% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 42.5% | 2016 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 61.3% | 57.4% | 38.5% | 38.6% | 25.8% | 50.0% | 36.9% |
| 20 | 2023 | 15/15 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 58.7% | 63.4% | 45.5% | 48.4% | 44.8% | 55.8% | 40.3% | 2017 | 6/6 | 0.3 | 4.5 | 64.8% | 46.8% | 41.7% | 37.2% | 30.8% | 44.6% | 40.2% |
| 21 | 2024 | 45/48 | 5.1 | 2.8 | 55.1% | 68.5% | 50.0% | 57.6% | 41.8% | 60.2% | 41.4% | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 63.2% | 53.8% | 52.5% | 51.8% | 60.6% | 53.4% | 48.3% |
| 22 | 2025 | 12/18 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 62.1% | 67.3% | 47.5% | 49.0% | 49.7% | 59.8% | 40.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 30/30 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 58.8% | 69.6% | 46.4% | 58.9% | 46.6% | 59.5% | 40.5% | 2020 | 11/11 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 68.6% | 52.6% | 48.3% | 49.7% | 43.7% | 51.2% | 46.7% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 31/34 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 61.1% | 62.3% | 46.9% | 52.9% | 43.9% | 56.0% | 45.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 66.6% | 45.4% | 56.2% | 44.3% | 59.0% | 42.8% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 31/31 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 61.7% | 60.8% | 42.9% | 52.9% | 56.4% | 54.0% | 40.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34/35 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 65.4% | 58.5% | 40.2% | 50.1% | 40.3% | 52.2% | 40.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5/5 | 2.2 | 4.6 | 66.0% | 59.4% | 50.2% | 40.9% | 17.3% | 54.9% | 36.7% |
| Career | — | 133/143 | 3.8 | 2.8 | 58.1% | 66.5% | 47.7% | 56.2% | 45.4% | 58.4% | 40.8% | — | 131/136 | 1.7 | 3.7 | 63.5% | 59.4% | 44.0% | 50.6% | 44.1% | 53.6% | 42.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Diane Parry | Nadia Podoroska | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1503 | 101.4 | -1.25 | -1.30 | 0.674 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | — | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 1465 | 97.7 | -0.30 | -1.23 | 0.727 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2021 | 1591 | 100.9 | +1.03 | -2.35 | 0.751 | 45.9% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 1646 | 119.9 | -0.42 | -0.28 | 0.959 | 49.4% | -101 | +12 | +74 | 48.3% | -0.34 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.1 | -0.65 | 2016 | 1575 | 106.0 | -1.26 | -1.72 | 0.738 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.22 |
| 20 | 2023 | 1642 | 111.9 | -0.45 | -1.72 | 0.911 | 47.9% | -212 | +131 | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 2–3 (40%) | 0–3 (0%) | 96.2 | -0.24 | 2017 | 1609 | 100.8 | -4.92 | -1.96 | 0.726 | 42.0% | — | -7 | — | 33.3% | -1.92 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 21 | 2024 | 1722 | 135.1 | +2.52 | -1.62 | 1.038 | 50.7% | -55 | +35 | +55 | 52.7% | +0.11 | 11–9 (55%) | 9–5 (64%) | 109.9 | +0.64 | 2018 | 1581 | 102.9 | -0.91 | -1.28 | 1.037 | 51.0% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 22 | 2025 | 1626 | 122.0 | +1.29 | -1.19 | 1.017 | 50.6% | -35 | +24 | +198 | 43.9% | -0.22 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–1 (80%) | 103.8 | +0.40 | 2019 | 1510 | 85.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 1835 | 130.7 | +2.13 | -1.28 | 1.001 | 50.3% | -68 | -97 | -19 | 58.0% | +0.30 | 7–2 (78%) | 5–3 (63%) | 109.4 | +1.04 | 2020 | 1737 | 123.1 | -2.40 | +1.52 | 0.955 | 49.0% | -106 | +39 | — | 56.0% | +0.04 | 3–0 (100%) | 0–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1713 | 130.1 | -0.63 | +2.06 | 1.037 | 50.8% | -79 | +84 | -38 | 48.0% | -0.13 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–2 (78%) | 105.0 | +0.71 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1660 | 105.0 | +0.71 | -0.89 | 1.044 | 50.7% | -31 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.84 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1670 | 120.5 | -1.86 | -1.71 | 0.886 | 47.7% | -27 | +84 | -50 | 43.2% | -0.43 | 6–6 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.0 | -0.19 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1644 | 121.6 | -3.46 | -2.62 | 0.842 | 46.2% | +35 | -18 | — | 33.3% | -1.16 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–6 (25%) | 93.1 | -0.31 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1641 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.25 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1614 | 110.8 | +1.33 | -1.66 | 0.814 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 30.8% | -1.54 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.17 |
| Career | — | 1845 | 127.8 | +1.30 | -1.26 | 0.981 | 49.8% | -76 | +25 | +67 | 49.7% | -0.11 | 27–21 (56%) | 22–16 (58%) | 111.8 | +1.04 | — | 1768 | 121.8 | -1.86 | -0.74 | 0.910 | 47.9% | -29 | +39 | -44 | 41.7% | -0.67 | 21–20 (51%) | 14–13 (52%) | 101.1 | +0.15 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Nadia Podoroska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatjana Maria | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 22, 2024 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 26, 2024 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 3 | 0 | 3 | Sep 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 28, 2024 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 23, 2024 | H2H |