H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Donna Vekic vs Kirsten Flipkens H2H: 0-4

Kirsten Flipkens holds a 4–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kirsten Flipkens leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kirsten Flipkens won the 2018 Auckland third round 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Vekic
CRO Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Kirsten Flipkens
BEL Age 40 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 4, 2018* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #76 7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 Donna Vekic #54 Match data
Jan 30, 2017 St. Petersburg WTA 500 Q3 Q Hard Kirsten Flipkens #76 6-4 5-7 7-5 Donna Vekic #88 Match data
Apr 21, 2016* Istanbul WTA 250 R32 Clay Kirsten Flipkens #58 7-6(5) 6-4 Donna Vekic #93 Match data
Apr 7, 2016* Katowice WTA 250 R32 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #59 6-1 6-4 Donna Vekic #92 Match data
Oct 10, 2013* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Kirsten Flipkens #19 2-6 6-2 6-2 Donna Vekic #81 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Donna Vekic #35 #17 2,458 1,908 230 232 49.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Kirsten Flipkens #531 #13 2,961 1,829 198 221 47.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Vekic Kirsten Flipkens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #380 1,485 0 0
18 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,550 0 1 2004 2–2 50.0% #168 1,500 0 0
19 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1 2005 1–2 33.3% #202 1,498 0 0
20 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,563 0 1 2006 3–5 37.5% #104 1,523 0 0
21 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,669 0 2 2007 0–2 0.0% #287 1,507 0 0
22 2018 27–23 54.0% #34 1,761 0 2 2008 1–2 33.3% #111 1,501 0 0
23 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,767 0 2 2009 8–10 44.4% #81 1,587 0 0
24 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,693 0 2 2010 15–15 50.0% #77 1,666 0 0
25 2021 14–14 50.0% #68 1,745 0 3 2011 5–9 35.7% #192 1,608 0 0
26 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,799 0 3 2012 13–4 76.5% #54 1,762 0 1
27 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,776 0 4 2013 32–23 58.2% #20 1,734 0 1
28 2024 26–19 57.8% #19 1,862 0 4 2014 23–26 46.9% #45 1,657 0 1
29 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,734 0 4 2015 14–17 45.2% #85 1,657 0 1
30 2026 10–9 52.6% #35 1,795 0 5 2016 21–20 51.2% #65 1,642 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 16–21 43.2% #74 1,695 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2018 21–20 51.2% #47 1,660 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2019 15–22 40.5% #71 1,747 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–8 20.0% #86 1,703 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–6 14.3% #311 1,659 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2022 5–5 50.0% #251 1,685 0 1