H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Maria Sharapova H2H: 1-1
Donna Vekic and Maria Sharapova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Sharapova leads 1–0 on clay, while Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2020 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-3 6-4 | Maria Sharapova | Match data |
| May 31, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Maria Sharapova | 7-5 6-4 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Maria Sharapova | #373 | #1 | 10,690 | 2,238 | 596 | 174 | 77.4% | 5 | 14 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Maria Sharapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 55–16 | 77.5% | #4 | 2,063 | 1 | 7 |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,068 | 1 | 10 |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 59–10 | 85.5% | #2 | 2,210 | 2 | 15 |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 40–12 | 76.9% | #5 | 2,113 | 2 | 16 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 31–6 | 83.8% | #9 | 2,098 | 3 | 19 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 31–9 | 77.5% | #14 | 2,050 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 33–11 | 75.0% | #18 | 1,981 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 1,993 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 55–10 | 84.6% | #2 | 2,155 | 4 | 27 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 37–8 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,136 | 4 | 29 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 50–13 | 79.4% | #2 | 2,093 | 5 | 33 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,044 | 5 | 35 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #91 | 2,049 | 5 | 35 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #61 | 1,976 | 5 | 36 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #29 | 1,929 | 5 | 36 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,858 | 5 | 36 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,820 | 5 | 36 |