H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Varvara Lepchenko
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Donna Vekic vs Varvara Lepchenko.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
USA
Age 40
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Varvara Lepchenko | #172 | #19 | 1,875 | 1,804 | 155 | 220 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Donna Vekic | Varvara Lepchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #132 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #102 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #74 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #54 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #35 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #47 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #90 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #129 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #127 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |