H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Donna Vekic vs Victoria Azarenka H2H: 3-1

Donna Vekic holds a 3–1 lead over Victoria Azarenka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2023 Cincinnati Open second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Victoria Azarenka
Belarus Age 37 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Vekic #22 3-6 6-3 6-4 Victoria Azarenka #18 Match data Aug 17, 2023* R32 Cincinnati Open WTA 1000 Hard
Victoria Azarenka #59 6-2 6-3 Donna Vekic #24 Match data Aug 23, 2020* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Donna Vekic #26 6-2 7-5 Victoria Azarenka #40 Match data Aug 15, 2019* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Donna Vekic #25 6-4 6-3 Victoria Azarenka #38 Match data Aug 2, 2019* R16 San Jose Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Donna Vekic #39 #17 2,458 1,933 243 239 50.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Victoria Azarenka #455 #1 10,955 2,249 582 268 68.5% 2 10 0 4 5 21

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Donna Vekic Victoria Azarenka
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 3–2 60.0% #152 1,524 0 0
16 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0 2006 9–12 42.9% #92 1,570 0 0
17 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0 2007 30–16 65.2% #30 1,816 0 0
18 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1 2008 40–20 66.7% #15 1,872 0 0
19 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1 2009 45–15 75.0% #7 1,940 0 3
20 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1 2010 42–20 67.7% #10 1,948 0 5
21 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2 2011 55–18 75.3% #3 2,020 0 8
22 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2 2012 69–12 85.2% #1 2,178 1 14
23 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2 2013 43–12 78.2% #2 2,126 2 17
24 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2 2014 15–9 62.5% #31 1,980 2 17
25 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3 2015 31–14 68.9% #22 1,985 2 17
26 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3 2016 24–5 82.8% #13 2,046 2 20
27 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4 2017 4–2 66.7% #205 2,018 2 20
28 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4 2018 17–12 58.6% #51 1,892 2 20
29 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,741 0 4 2019 21–17 55.3% #50 1,853 2 20
30 2026 12–13 48.0% #39 1,745 0 5 2020 19–6 76.0% #13 1,959 2 21
31 — — — — — — — 2021 29–14 67.4% #27 2,010 2 21
32 — — — — — — — 2022 24–14 63.2% #26 1,941 2 21
33 — — — — — — — 2023 23–21 52.3% #22 1,802 2 21
34 — — — — — — — 2024 30–15 66.7% #20 1,900 2 21
35 — — — — — — — 2025 9–12 42.9% #132 1,831 2 21

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Donna Vekic Victoria Azarenka
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2007 21 10 31 67.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
18 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 22 11 33 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 32 10 42 76.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
20 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 32 12 44 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
21 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 32 12 44 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
22 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 2012 47 6 53 88.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — —
23 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 32 8 40 80.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 19 9 28 67.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
26 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2016 22 2 24 91.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 2018 14 7 21 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2019 12 11 23 52.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2020 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 19 9 28 67.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 18 11 29 62.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 17 14 31 54.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 20 10 30 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
Career — 149 162 311 47.9% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1% — — — — — 406 169 575 70.6% 116 66 182 63.7% 60 32 92 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 444/483 of Donna Vekic's and 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Donna Vekic Victoria Azarenka
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2% 2006 9/21 3.4 3.3 58.1% 59.6% 40.0% 46.4% 50.1% 51.3% 43.7%
17 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8% 2007 37/46 2.3 4.0 59.8% 65.1% 46.3% 57.3% 47.8% 57.7% 47.3%
18 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1% 2008 49/60 2.2 2.8 67.1% 68.3% 46.8% 58.0% 54.3% 61.2% 49.5%
19 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4% 2009 55/60 1.5 3.2 71.8% 65.3% 45.5% 54.3% 55.0% 59.9% 51.5%
20 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3% 2010 53/62 1.5 3.8 70.6% 65.5% 44.8% 53.2% 57.4% 59.2% 50.1%
21 2017 36/37 4.0 5.3 56.0% 65.3% 45.8% 58.3% 47.7% 56.5% 40.6% 2011 66/73 1.3 3.2 70.3% 66.5% 47.4% 52.3% 49.7% 60.5% 50.6%
22 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4% 2012 65/81 1.7 4.1 67.6% 68.9% 48.0% 58.2% 54.9% 62.2% 52.6%
23 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0% 2013 50/55 1.6 4.9 66.9% 65.9% 41.8% 56.9% 54.0% 58.0% 54.1%
24 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5% 2014 22/24 2.9 6.0 67.5% 65.6% 39.5% 57.5% 52.4% 57.5% 45.7%
25 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1% 2015 39/45 2.4 4.4 70.2% 67.9% 48.3% 55.9% 56.0% 61.9% 48.2%
26 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5% 2016 27/29 2.4 4.4 65.4% 73.5% 46.9% 64.1% 51.5% 64.3% 52.3%
27 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6% 2017 6/6 3.0 4.3 64.3% 67.5% 49.0% 51.8% 37.2% 60.3% 42.9%
28 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1% 2018 28/29 2.6 4.0 66.8% 64.3% 42.7% 51.9% 51.6% 57.1% 46.6%
29 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1% 2019 38/38 3.2 4.2 61.4% 65.0% 44.4% 52.8% 47.9% 57.2% 47.2%
30 2026 24/25 3.9 4.5 58.0% 67.7% 45.2% 55.4% 38.1% 58.4% 40.9% 2020 24/25 2.7 2.5 69.0% 64.4% 45.7% 54.5% 52.5% 58.7% 48.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 36/43 3.0 4.7 62.5% 66.2% 44.5% 51.0% 51.2% 57.9% 49.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 37/38 2.2 4.7 60.5% 67.3% 44.2% 51.0% 50.2% 57.8% 46.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 42/45 3.1 4.5 63.3% 68.1% 45.1% 51.9% 47.7% 59.4% 46.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 45/45 2.8 4.1 64.6% 67.2% 44.2% 61.4% 47.6% 59.0% 46.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 15/21 2.7 4.1 62.3% 61.4% 43.3% 49.7% 57.0% 54.3% 46.1%
Career — 444/483 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.7% 44.9% 50.2% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0% — 743/851 2.2 4.0 66.4% 66.6% 45.3% 55.1% 52.0% 59.4% 49.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Donna Vekic Victoria Azarenka
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1525 103.3 — — — — +24 — — 50.0% +0.63 — — — +0.52
16 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32 2006 1570 128.4 -1.78 -0.93 0.897 47.6% +53 -79 — 46.9% +0.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.56
17 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -0.09 2007 1817 144.9 +1.83 +3.32 1.118 52.3% +2 -215 -230 65.0% +1.17 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 103.3 -0.21
18 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 100.6 -0.23 2008 1873 154.6 +5.10 +4.52 1.274 55.2% -23 -60 -274 69.4% +1.66 5–6 (45%) 5–3 (63%) 100.7 +1.30
19 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62 2009 1940 165.5 +4.27 +7.62 1.283 55.3% +35 -48 -221 74.2% +1.69 6–8 (43%) 10–4 (71%) 101.7 -1.25
20 2016 1563 111.8 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 -0.76 2010 1948 163.1 +3.61 +6.46 1.229 54.3% +50 -169 -123 70.0% +1.62 8–4 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 +0.88
21 2017 1670 128.8 +0.13 -1.26 0.933 48.8% -42 -177 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 94.6 -0.63 2011 2020 163.1 +4.84 +7.25 1.283 55.2% +14 -108 -106 76.4% +1.97 9–7 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 100.1 -0.87
22 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -52 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) 92.6 +0.05 2012 2179 172.2 +6.83 +9.26 1.391 57.1% +14 -159 -139 81.5% +2.40 13–1 (93%) 9–7 (56%) 107.9 -3.63
23 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) 89.1 +1.18 2013 2127 170.4 +3.42 +9.80 1.286 55.8% +45 -52 — 75.2% +1.93 11–4 (73%) 9–1 (90%) 107.2 -1.19
24 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.62 2014 1981 145.7 +1.37 +1.88 1.075 51.6% +69 — +2 57.9% +0.70 6–3 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.19
25 2021 1761 140.5 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 97.9 -0.11 2015 1985 163.4 +3.97 +6.66 1.263 54.8% +4 +65 +22 71.6% +1.60 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) 94.5 -3.58
26 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -0.92 2016 2046 160.1 +5.89 +7.41 1.465 57.8% +75 -18 — 87.3% +2.89 3–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +0.93
27 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 104.1 -0.44 2017 2019 110.5 +1.49 -0.08 1.082 50.5% — — -2 53.3% +0.33 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — -0.17
28 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -95 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) 100.0 -0.31 2018 1892 145.2 +0.15 +3.55 1.085 51.8% +122 +74 +62 58.6% +0.79 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.47
29 2025 1741 135.8 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +7 +22 +152 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 96.9 +1.04 2019 1853 151.2 +0.69 +4.19 1.101 52.1% +42 +134 +85 56.1% +0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.5 -3.62
30 2026 1745 136.5 +1.44 -0.81 0.983 49.6% -63 +83 +195 50.0% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.3 +0.20 2020 1959 158.3 +1.76 +5.63 1.182 53.7% +34 +20 — 69.2% +1.50 4–2 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 104.8 -1.12
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2010 152.2 +2.04 +6.39 1.179 53.7% +34 +16 +34 69.4% +1.14 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 -0.48
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1941 149.0 +1.08 +3.67 1.112 52.4% +23 +72 — 61.0% +0.79 8–4 (67%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 +0.63
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1803 150.1 +2.06 +3.24 1.134 52.6% +64 +108 +178 56.8% +0.84 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 90.7 +1.56
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1900 158.8 +2.22 +3.55 1.126 52.7% +28 +27 +154 64.0% +1.17 12–6 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 101.4 +0.43
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1832 137.2 -1.16 +1.90 1.008 50.1% +50 +34 +224 43.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 99.3 -0.03
Career — 1933 141.1 +0.87 +0.34 1.014 50.3% -15 -75 +82 50.5% +0.11 74–86 (46%) 59–76 (44%) 94.2 +0.11 — 2249 165.9 +3.19 +5.72 1.211 54.1% +34 -41 -35 68.1% +1.42 123–85 (59%) 92–70 (57%) 101.9 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.