H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Anna-Lena Friedsam H2H: 1-1
Ekaterina Alexandrova and Anna-Lena Friedsam are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 1–0 on clay, while Anna-Lena Friedsam leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ekaterina Alexandrova won the 2023 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 6-2 6-0 | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2019 | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | Q1 | Clay | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 7-5 6-2 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Anna-Lena Friedsam | 6-4 7-6(1) | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | #227 | #45 | 1,160 | 1,740 | 61 | 83 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Anna-Lena Friedsam | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #95 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #483 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #111 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #140 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #135 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |