H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Magdalena Frech H2H: 1-2
Magdalena Frech holds a 2–1 lead over Ekaterina Alexandrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2024 Dubai second round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2024* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2023* | Guadalajara | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 7-6(4) 7-6(8) | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Magdalena Frech | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Magdalena Frech | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |