H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Ekaterina Alexandrova vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 1-1
Ekaterina Alexandrova and Yulia Putintseva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ekaterina Alexandrova leads 1–0 on clay, while Yulia Putintseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2024 Indian Wells second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2024* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 7-5 6-1 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2023* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 6-1 6-3 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | #19 | #10 | 3,375 | 1,985 | 248 | 189 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Alexandrova | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #73 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #35 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #34 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #19 | 1,905 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2023 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #28 | 1,780 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2025 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #10 | 1,949 | 0 | 6 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #19 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |