H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Ekaterina Makarova vs Anastasia Rodionova H2H: 1-1

Ekaterina Makarova and Anastasia Rodionova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Rodionova leads 1–0 on clay, while Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2013 Toronto second round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ekaterina Makarova
RUS Age 38 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Anastasia Rodionova
AUS Age 44 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2013 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Ekaterina Makarova #24 6-1 7-5 Anastasia Rodionova #128 Match data
May 25, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Anastasia Rodionova #92 6-3 6-2 Ekaterina Makarova #99 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ekaterina Makarova #1,000 #8 3,620 1,940 248 222 52.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Anastasia Rodionova #872 #62 1,095 1,649 86 150 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ekaterina Makarova Anastasia Rodionova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #239 1,491 0 0
19 2007 2–2 50.0% #110 1,536 0 0 2001 0–2 0.0% #195 1,468 0 0
20 2008 17–20 45.9% #46 1,626 0 0 2002 5–3 62.5% #118 1,521 0 0
21 2009 19–22 46.3% #60 1,634 0 0 2003 7–8 46.7% #165 1,546 0 0
22 2010 14–20 41.2% #49 1,662 0 1 2004 0–1 0.0% #212 1,530 0 0
23 2011 15–23 39.5% #53 1,604 0 1 2005 2–3 40.0% #140 1,517 0 0
24 2012 26–19 57.8% #20 1,757 0 1 2006 10–15 40.0% #94 1,526 0 0
25 2013 24–18 57.1% #24 1,838 0 1 2007 11–20 35.5% #78 1,525 0 0
26 2014 39–21 65.0% #11 1,837 0 2 2008 8–20 28.6% #98 1,503 0 0
27 2015 26–16 61.9% #23 1,784 0 2 2009 5–9 35.7% #95 1,522 0 0
28 2016 23–18 56.1% #30 1,782 0 2 2010 17–20 45.9% #64 1,606 0 0
29 2017 27–21 56.2% #33 1,836 0 3 2011 8–21 27.6% #108 1,573 0 0
30 2018 16–19 45.7% #57 1,750 0 3 2012 6–13 31.6% #139 1,539 0 0
31 2019 0–3 0.0% #997 1,700 0 3 2013 2–7 22.2% #162 1,502 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2014 2–3 40.0% #185 1,514 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–2 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #797 1,476 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2017 2–1 66.7% #390 1,485 0 0