H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova holds a 1–0 lead over Jamie Loeb in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Makarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2017 Washington Open quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Jamie Loeb | Match data | Aug 1, 2017 | QF | Washington Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,942 | 252 | 225 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Jamie Loeb | #484 | #132 | 460 | 1,577 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,840 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,840 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #484 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2007 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 165 | 149 | 314 | 52.5% | 45 | 46 | 91 | 49.5% | 42 | 28 | 70 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 442/477 of Ekaterina Makarova's and 13/13 of Jamie Loeb's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2007 | 4/4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 66.4% | 54.5% | 37.8% | 48.4% | 66.9% | 48.3% | 39.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 30/37 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 60.2% | 62.5% | 44.2% | 40.5% | 45.0% | 55.1% | 43.0% | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 50.9% | 44.8% | 42.9% | 50.0% | — | 43.9% | 23.7% |
| 21 | 2009 | 39/41 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 58.6% | 64.0% | 40.9% | 48.2% | 50.2% | 54.2% | 43.9% | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 55.9% | 53.4% | 45.4% | 41.7% | 14.3% | 49.9% | 26.1% |
| 22 | 2010 | 31/34 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 59.6% | 59.5% | 47.6% | 57.5% | 52.7% | 54.8% | 41.5% | 2017 | 4/4 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 50.4% | 62.8% | 41.8% | 28.7% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 42.1% |
| 23 | 2011 | 36/38 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 60.5% | 64.0% | 43.2% | 47.4% | 47.1% | 55.6% | 39.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 45/45 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 62.9% | 64.9% | 50.6% | 55.1% | 49.3% | 59.5% | 43.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 41/42 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 64.4% | 66.3% | 47.4% | 57.6% | 50.6% | 59.3% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 56/60 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 64.0% | 65.1% | 47.7% | 59.9% | 44.7% | 58.9% | 45.0% | 2021 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 52.4% | 59.2% | 48.5% | 61.1% | 33.3% | 54.0% | 33.7% |
| 27 | 2015 | 36/42 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 66.0% | 65.8% | 54.1% | 55.9% | 53.9% | 61.6% | 43.2% | 2022 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 8.0 | 58.1% | 73.5% | 37.3% | 62.2% | 21.4% | 58.5% | 28.7% |
| 28 | 2016 | 40/48 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 65.6% | 65.1% | 47.3% | 58.4% | 53.6% | 59.0% | 42.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 47/48 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 65.5% | 64.2% | 45.5% | 52.2% | 45.3% | 57.7% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 34/35 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 64.4% | 63.8% | 43.6% | 56.6% | 44.0% | 56.6% | 41.5% | 2025 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 68.8% | 56.4% | 28.0% | 53.3% | 50.0% | 47.5% | 42.7% |
| 31 | 2019 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 67.3% | 61.0% | 43.4% | 52.0% | 36.3% | 55.6% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 442/477 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 63.2% | 64.2% | 46.6% | 54.0% | 48.7% | 57.6% | 43.0% | — | 13/14 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 54.3% | 60.3% | 42.2% | 46.9% | 31.1% | 52.3% | 34.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Jamie Loeb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2007 | 1536 | 118.3 | +1.82 | -0.84 | 0.769 | 44.4% | +21 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.10 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 1626 | 124.1 | -0.08 | -0.65 | 0.958 | 48.7% | -33 | -52 | +24 | 46.5% | -0.34 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.4 | -0.55 | 2015 | 1497 | 102.9 | +2.82 | +1.02 | 0.422 | 35.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 |
| 21 | 2009 | 1634 | 131.6 | -1.02 | +0.38 | 0.960 | 49.1% | -45 | +48 | +32 | 47.4% | -0.49 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–0 (100%) | 107.5 | -0.92 | 2016 | 1501 | 99.5 | -1.29 | -5.38 | 0.522 | 38.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 22 | 2010 | 1663 | 122.5 | -0.26 | -1.13 | 0.918 | 48.3% | -104 | -64 | +173 | 45.5% | -0.53 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–2 (71%) | 98.1 | -2.59 | 2017 | 1535 | 115.6 | -1.34 | -1.45 | 0.887 | 47.6% | +41 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | -0.10 |
| 23 | 2011 | 1606 | 131.9 | +0.66 | -2.66 | 0.887 | 47.4% | -47 | +70 | +141 | 40.9% | -0.75 | 6–6 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 101.5 | -1.38 | 2018 | 1520 | 103.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | 0.00 |
| 24 | 2012 | 1758 | 146.6 | +3.45 | +1.31 | 1.076 | 51.4% | -30 | -80 | +28 | 57.1% | +0.51 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–6 (40%) | 96.8 | -2.49 | 2019 | 1472 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 1836 | 145.0 | +3.78 | +1.69 | 1.108 | 52.2% | -22 | -149 | -40 | 59.3% | +0.60 | 5–8 (38%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.8 | -1.08 | 2020 | 1444 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 1841 | 150.2 | +3.13 | +1.93 | 1.095 | 51.8% | +1 | -157 | +25 | 60.2% | +0.56 | 11–2 (85%) | 5–6 (45%) | 106.8 | -1.18 | 2021 | 1439 | 92.5 | +1.84 | +1.86 | 0.732 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | — | — | -0.15 |
| 27 | 2015 | 1795 | 142.0 | +3.14 | +1.65 | 1.125 | 52.5% | +49 | -71 | +5 | 64.8% | +0.89 | 4–7 (36%) | 5–1 (83%) | 98.0 | +1.69 | 2022 | 1447 | 104.9 | -0.88 | +0.62 | 0.692 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.60 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.14 |
| 28 | 2016 | 1776 | 140.5 | +2.86 | -0.13 | 1.035 | 50.8% | +17 | -78 | +71 | 55.0% | +0.41 | 8–9 (47%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.7 | +0.36 | 2023 | 1428 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 1841 | 148.6 | +1.78 | +0.54 | 1.022 | 50.2% | +18 | -103 | -20 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 10–6 (63%) | 6–6 (50%) | 104.6 | -2.16 | 2024 | 1391 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1757 | 140.7 | +0.52 | -0.09 | 0.957 | 49.2% | +11 | -59 | +62 | 45.8% | -0.40 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.3 | -2.54 | 2025 | 1422 | 105.4 | -1.30 | -3.22 | 0.813 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1707 | 109.2 | -2.16 | -1.63 | 0.871 | 47.4% | +6 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | 0.00 | 2026 | 1410 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1942 | 146.2 | +1.78 | +0.38 | 1.014 | 50.2% | -11 | -55 | +51 | 52.5% | +0.08 | 72–73 (50%) | 49–43 (53%) | 104.0 | -2.73 | — | 1578 | 106.4 | -0.20 | -0.92 | 0.719 | 44.1% | +41 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.66 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–4 (20%) | 92.9 | -2.71 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | 6 | 8 | 14 | Mar 10, 2018 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 26, 2016 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Feb 1, 2018 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 3 | 6 | 9 | Apr 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Petkovic | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 2, 2018 | H2H |
| Lauren Davis | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 24, 2022 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2022 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 1, 2021 | H2H |