H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ekaterina Makarova vs Timea Bacsinszky H2H: 1-3
Timea Bacsinszky holds a 3–1 lead over Ekaterina Makarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Timea Bacsinszky leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Makarova won the 2018 Miami first round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 38
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ekaterina Makarova | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Timea Bacsinszky | Match data |
| May 3, 2016* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2015* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2014* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Timea Bacsinszky | 6-4 6-1 | Ekaterina Makarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekaterina Makarova | #1,000 | #8 | 3,620 | 1,940 | 248 | 222 | 52.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Timea Bacsinszky | #941 | #9 | 3,157 | 1,933 | 161 | 137 | 54.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ekaterina Makarova | Timea Bacsinszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #46 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #53 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #60 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #49 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #53 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #20 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #24 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #48 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #11 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 37–14 | 72.5% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,777 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,782 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #39 | 1,816 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #33 | 1,836 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #191 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #57 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #997 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |