H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Baltacha vs Jamie Hampton H2H: 2-0
Elena Baltacha holds a 2–0 lead over Jamie Hampton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Baltacha leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Baltacha won the 2011 US Open first round 2-6 6-2 5-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena Baltacha | 2-6 6-2 5-1 (ret.) | Jamie Hampton | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena Baltacha | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Jamie Hampton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Baltacha | #225 | #49 | 1,179 | 1,664 | 47 | 74 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jamie Hampton | #323 | #24 | 2,036 | 1,806 | 42 | 40 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Baltacha | Jamie Hampton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #133 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #144 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #187 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #136 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #323 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #51 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #174 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |