H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Carla Suárez Navarro H2H: 0-1
Carla Suárez Navarro holds a 1–0 lead over Elena-Gabriela Ruse in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2017 Bucharest fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 37
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2017* | Bucharest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Carla Suárez Navarro | 6-3 6-4 | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | #342 | #6 | 4,015 | 2,022 | 339 | 247 | 57.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Carla Suárez Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #17 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,835 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #13 | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 |