H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Evgeniya Rodina H2H: 1-1
Elena-Gabriela Ruse and Evgeniya Rodina are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena-Gabriela Ruse leads 1–0 on grass, while Evgeniya Rodina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeniya Rodina won the 2022 Monastir third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 37
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2022* | Monastir | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Evgeniya Rodina | 6-1 6-3 | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
| Jun 13, 2019* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-3 6-3 | Evgeniya Rodina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Evgeniya Rodina | #1,376 | #67 | 882 | 1,663 | 74 | 119 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Evgeniya Rodina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #320 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #107 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #106 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #370 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #295 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #438 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #443 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |