H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 0-2
Lesia Tsurenko holds a 2–0 lead over Elena-Gabriela Ruse in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2022 Portoroz third round 6-1 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2022* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2021* | Cluj-Napoca 1 | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-3 6-3 | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |