H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elena Rybakina vs Caty Mcnally H2H: 2-1
Elena Rybakina holds a 2–1 lead over Caty Mcnally in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Caty Mcnally leads 1–0 on clay, while Elena Rybakina leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Rybakina won the 2026 Wimbledon second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 27
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Elena Rybakina | 6-1 6-2 | Caty Mcnally | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Caty Mcnally | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Caty Mcnally | 6-4 0-0 (ret.) | Elena Rybakina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | #2 | #2 | 8,705 | 2,247 | 296 | 125 | 70.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Caty Mcnally | #57 | #50 | 1,136 | 1,834 | 59 | 69 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Rybakina | Caty Mcnally | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #120 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #435 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #142 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #37 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #148 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #540 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #21 | 1,906 | 1 | 3 | 2025 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #85 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #4 | 2,017 | 1 | 5 | 2026 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #57 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,031 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2025 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #5 | 2,168 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2026 | 34–11 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,104 | 2 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |