H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Donna Vekic H2H: 3-0
Elina Svitolina holds a 3–0 lead over Donna Vekic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elina Svitolina leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elina Svitolina won the 2018 Birmingham third round 6-1 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2018* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Elina Svitolina | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Apr 30, 2015* | Marrakech | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elina Svitolina | 6-2 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2013* | Baku | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 6-2 6-3 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |