H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Julia Goerges H2H: 0-1
Julia Goerges holds a 1–0 lead over Elina Svitolina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Goerges leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Goerges won the 2017 Cincinnati fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2017* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Julia Goerges | 7-5 6-4 | Elina Svitolina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Julia Goerges | #45 | #9 | 3,980 | 1,940 | 304 | 249 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elina Svitolina | Julia Goerges | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #77 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #40 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #21 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #72 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | 2014 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #74 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2015 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | 2016 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | 2017 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,880 | 0 | 4 |
| 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | 2019 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,799 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,761 | 0 | 7 |
| 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |