H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 1-0
Elina Svitolina holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Siegemund in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elina Svitolina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elina Svitolina won the 2026 Indian Wells second round 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2026 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | Laura Siegemund | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elina Svitolina | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |