H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich H2H: 0-1
Aliaksandra Sasnovich holds a 1–0 lead over Elisabetta Cocciaretto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Aliaksandra Sasnovich won the 2022 US Open first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 25
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-2 6-4 | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabetta Cocciaretto | #68 | #29 | 1,420 | 1,843 | 79 | 90 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #68 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |