H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:17 UTC
Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Ana Bogdan H2H: 2-1
Elisabetta Cocciaretto holds a 2–1 lead over Ana Bogdan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Elisabetta Cocciaretto leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elisabetta Cocciaretto won the 2025 Cluj-Napoca fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 25
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 33
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2025 | Cluj-Napoca | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 6-3 6-0 | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2024* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 2-6 6-1 7-6(6) | Ana Bogdan | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ana Bogdan | 6-1 6-3 | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabetta Cocciaretto | #68 | #29 | 1,420 | 1,843 | 79 | 90 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ana Bogdan | #448 | #39 | 1,214 | 1,830 | 95 | 114 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Ana Bogdan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2022 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #150 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #68 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #76 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #56 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #69 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #448 | 1,608 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |