H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Belinda Cordwell H2H: 0-1
Belinda Cordwell holds a 1–0 lead over Elise Burgin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Belinda Cordwell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Belinda Cordwell won the 1988 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Belinda Cordwell | 6-4 6-3 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Belinda Cordwell | — | — | — | 1,833 | 79 | 82 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Belinda Cordwell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–20 | 50.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 25–11 | 69.4% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |