Elise Burgin
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zina Garrison | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 17, 1992 | H2H |
| Terry Phelps | 1 | 6 | 7 | Jan 4, 1990 | H2H |
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 30, 1989 | H2H |
| Bettina Bunge | 2 | 5 | 7 | Mar 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 6 | 6 | Nov 3, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Ruth Seeman H2H: 1-0
Elise Burgin holds a 1–0 lead over Ruth Seeman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Burgin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Burgin won the 1989 ASB Classic round of 32 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | 6-3 6-4 | Ruth Seeman | Match data | Feb 2, 1989* | R32 | ASB Classic | WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Ruth Seeman | — | — | — | 1,541 | 9 | 11 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Ruth Seeman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Ruth Seeman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1987 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1988 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1988 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1989 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 29.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 64 | 77 | 141 | 45.4% | 34 | 30 | 64 | 53.1% | 26 | 34 | 60 | 43.3% | 8 | 24 | 32 | 25.0% | — | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Ruth Seeman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1484 | 99.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.06 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1505 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 57.9% | +1.16 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.95 |
| 18 | 1980 | 1476 | 93.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 1509 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | +69 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.64 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 1584 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.8% | -1.19 | 3–2 (60%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.6 | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 1743 | 128.0 | — | — | — | — | +6 | — | -177 | 54.0% | +0.10 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–0 | — | -0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 1716 | 125.3 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | -103 | 37.5% | -0.88 | 5–3 (63%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.2 | -2.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 1773 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | -63 | -51 | -73 | 51.7% | +0.03 | 11–5 (69%) | 6–8 (43%) | 106.3 | -1.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 1776 | 142.7 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +19 | -104 | 53.2% | +0.25 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–4 (50%) | 98.8 | -2.16 | 1987 | 1510 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.60 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.16 |
| 25 | 1987 | 1703 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | -19 | +39 | +12 | 45.2% | -0.32 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–4 (56%) | 98.4 | -1.73 | 1988 | 1506 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.50 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 26 | 1988 | 1629 | 115.8 | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | +21 | 33.3% | -1.18 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.2 | -0.25 | 1989 | 1486 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 27 | 1989 | 1701 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +34 | -81 | 47.6% | -0.30 | 5–7 (42%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.1 | -1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 1569 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | -10 | +144 | +32 | 32.8% | -1.49 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–4 (50%) | 97.2 | -1.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 1528 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | -19 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 1524 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +174 | — | 37.5% | -1.50 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 1496 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1846 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -16 | +27 | -61 | 44.7% | -0.47 | 47–47 (50%) | 32–28 (53%) | 102.8 | -3.91 | — | 1542 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.20 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | +6.63 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ruth Seeman
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sandra Wasserman | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Elise Burgin | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 2, 1989 | H2H |
| Dianne Fromholtz | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 21, 1988 | H2H |
| Jamie Golder | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 1988 | H2H |
| Terry Phelps | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 29, 1988 | H2H |