H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Emiliana Arango holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiliana Arango leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiliana Arango won the 2023 Cluj Napoca second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiliana Arango | 6-3 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data | Oct 20, 2023* | R16 | Cluj Napoca | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Jil Teichmann | 6-1 7-5 | Emiliana Arango | Match data | Jul 30, 2022 | Q1 | San Jose | WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiliana Arango | #88 | #46 | 1,229 | 1,700 | 31 | 48 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiliana Arango | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #825 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #502 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #405 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2023 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #116 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #169 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #49 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Emiliana Arango | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2023 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2024 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2025 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2026 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 16.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 26 | 45 | 42.2% | 11 | 18 | 29 | 37.9% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/80 of Emiliana Arango's and 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Emiliana Arango | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 60.0% | 52.4% | 7.1% | 28.6% | 0.0% | 34.3% | 27.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 66.7% | 44.1% | 29.4% | 14.3% | 22.2% | 39.2% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 75.5% | 53.0% | 33.5% | 51.5% | 50.7% | 48.2% | 48.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 59.3% | 51.4% | 37.5% | 60.0% | 33.3% | 45.8% | 44.1% | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% |
| 20 | 2021 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 64.3% | 63.9% | 40.0% | 70.0% | 45.5% | 55.4% | 41.2% | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% |
| 22 | 2023 | 11/11 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 66.9% | 61.5% | 45.0% | 51.3% | 47.8% | 56.4% | 47.0% | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2024 | 10/10 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 71.8% | 57.6% | 37.9% | 49.6% | 46.4% | 51.3% | 43.1% | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2025 | 25/26 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 70.4% | 55.3% | 43.3% | 52.9% | 48.4% | 52.2% | 46.9% | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | 2026 | 25/26 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 69.3% | 56.5% | 44.9% | 45.8% | 39.5% | 52.9% | 43.4% | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% |
| Career | — | 78/80 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 69.5% | 56.6% | 42.2% | 49.4% | 44.1% | 52.3% | 44.9% | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Emiliana Arango | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2016 | 1484 | 91.5 | -2.51 | -2.53 | 0.418 | 30.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2017 | 1467 | 96.4 | -3.60 | -2.70 | 0.705 | 41.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 1489 | 104.7 | -1.46 | -1.18 | 0.932 | 48.2% | — | +44 | — | 80.0% | +2.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 1476 | 97.0 | -0.98 | -4.22 | 0.813 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 20 | 2021 | 1481 | 98.2 | -1.16 | -3.38 | 0.922 | 48.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1499 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2023 | 1626 | 117.4 | -0.01 | +1.49 | 1.077 | 51.4% | -16 | — | — | 59.1% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.79 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2024 | 1555 | 108.1 | -4.13 | -1.19 | 0.885 | 47.0% | -2 | +55 | — | 34.8% | -1.17 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.11 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 |
| 24 | 2025 | 1650 | 129.6 | -2.84 | +2.08 | 0.982 | 49.5% | +14 | -55 | — | 39.7% | -0.44 | 5–2 (71%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.1 | +0.66 | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1605 | 118.3 | -3.27 | +0.13 | 0.921 | 48.1% | -12 | -26 | -66 | 37.9% | -0.91 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.2 | +0.49 | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.10 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 1701 | 121.1 | -2.65 | +0.56 | 0.942 | 48.5% | -1 | -10 | -66 | 40.6% | -0.64 | 10–12 (45%) | 7–6 (54%) | 101.7 | +3.42 | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyu Wang | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Lourdes Carle | 2 | 0 | 2 | Mar 31, 2026 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 2 | 0 | 2 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Mccartney Kessler | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |