H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Katie Obrien H2H: 1-0
Emilie Loit holds a 1–0 lead over Katie Obrien in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2008 Fes third round 6-7(7) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Fes | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Emilie Loit | 6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | Katie Obrien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Katie Obrien | #782 | #84 | 769 | 1,514 | 9 | 34 | 20.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Emilie Loit | Katie Obrien | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #387 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #127 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #88 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #179 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,366 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |