H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Tiantian Sun H2H: 2-0
Emilie Loit holds a 2–0 lead over Tiantian Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Emilie Loit | 6-3 6-1 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
| May 24, 2007* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Emilie Loit | 7-5 6-3 | Tiantian Sun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Tiantian Sun | #819 | #77 | 395 | 1,650 | 27 | 54 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Emilie Loit | Tiantian Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #126 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #105 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #230 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |