H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Katerina Siniakova H2H: 2-2
Emma Navarro and Katerina Siniakova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Katerina Siniakova leads 2–0 on grass, while Emma Navarro leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2024 Berlin third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2024* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Katerina Siniakova | 6-4 6-3 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2024* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2024* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Emma Navarro | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2023* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Katerina Siniakova | 6-2 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 |