Emma Raducanu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Amanda Anisimova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2025 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 25, 2025 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 22, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Emma Raducanu vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 1-0
Emma Raducanu holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emma Raducanu leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emma Raducanu won the 2025 Italian Open second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | 6-2 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data | May 9, 2025 | R64 | Italian Open | WTA 1000 | Clay |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | #70 | #10 | 2,975 | 1,949 | 90 | 72 | 55.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jil Teichmann | #175 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,882 | 94 | 104 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,724 | 1 | 1 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 1 | 1 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,752 | 1 | 1 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #56 | 1,830 | 1 | 1 | 2019 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2025 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #29 | 1,876 | 1 | 1 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,834 | 1 | 1 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #175 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2021 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2017 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2019 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 12 | 2 | 14 | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2025 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2020 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2021 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 57 | 49 | 106 | 53.8% | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | — | 50 | 61 | 111 | 45.0% | 43 | 34 | 77 | 55.8% | 1 | 9 | 10 | 10.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/164 of Emma Raducanu's and 184/198 of Jil Teichmann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2021 | 18/18 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 68.5% | 69.9% | 43.1% | 58.9% | 38.2% | 61.2% | 45.6% | 2016 | 2/2 | 3.5 | 6.5 | 44.3% | 70.9% | 50.5% | 63.5% | 54.2% | 59.3% | 41.6% |
| 19 | 2022 | 34/34 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 67.8% | 63.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 53.1% | 58.1% | 44.8% | 2017 | 4/4 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 53.5% | 55.0% | 40.6% | 31.7% | 45.4% | 47.4% | 34.9% |
| 20 | 2023 | 10/11 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 62.8% | 65.7% | 49.3% | 53.4% | 33.3% | 59.2% | 41.0% | 2018 | 9/9 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 62.4% | 69.7% | 44.8% | 55.3% | 38.8% | 60.4% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 2024 | 31/32 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 64.5% | 63.7% | 46.5% | 63.3% | 51.1% | 57.7% | 45.4% | 2019 | 22/22 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 63.6% | 64.4% | 50.3% | 57.3% | 52.8% | 59.2% | 45.0% |
| 22 | 2025 | 39/48 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 65.8% | 65.3% | 47.0% | 58.2% | 51.8% | 59.1% | 45.6% | 2020 | 20/21 | 2.7 | 2.9 | 62.6% | 64.0% | 49.0% | 60.6% | 49.2% | 58.2% | 45.6% |
| 23 | 2026 | 18/21 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 66.5% | 62.4% | 48.1% | 51.6% | 59.7% | 58.2% | 49.0% | 2021 | 40/43 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 63.8% | 48.7% | 56.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 43.2% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40/40 | 2.3 | 3.7 | 60.3% | 63.7% | 45.7% | 52.8% | 49.0% | 56.3% | 42.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 27/27 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 59.7% | 61.7% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 44.7% | 54.6% | 41.2% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 64.1% | 60.7% | 40.1% | 31.7% | 51.0% | 52.6% | 50.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 8/17 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 63.6% | 58.2% | 35.0% | 35.0% | 29.0% | 50.2% | 35.5% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8/8 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 67.7% | 58.6% | 50.2% | 52.7% | 47.9% | 56.0% | 45.9% |
| Career | — | 150/163 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 66.2% | 64.7% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 50.1% | 58.7% | 45.5% | — | 184/198 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 60.9% | 63.2% | 46.4% | 52.8% | 46.6% | 56.5% | 42.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1725 | 136.6 | +2.85 | +1.24 | 1.176 | 53.0% | -9 | — | -66 | 69.4% | +1.25 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.59 | 2016 | 1524 | 100.0 | +0.12 | +0.08 | 1.022 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.18 |
| 19 | 2022 | 1733 | 139.2 | +0.89 | +1.65 | 1.068 | 51.5% | -16 | -140 | -90 | 54.3% | +0.66 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.0 | +0.76 | 2017 | 1523 | 105.8 | -2.24 | -1.97 | 0.664 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -2.55 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.23 |
| 20 | 2023 | 1752 | 128.8 | +1.74 | -0.36 | 1.004 | 49.6% | +1 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.05 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.50 | 2018 | 1533 | 114.7 | +2.45 | -2.19 | 1.002 | 49.7% | +16 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.15 | 0–2 | 0–4 (0%) | — | -0.57 |
| 21 | 2024 | 1831 | 142.8 | +1.02 | +2.56 | 1.074 | 51.9% | -42 | -221 | -10 | 59.7% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.1 | -0.44 | 2019 | 1610 | 121.1 | +1.59 | +1.12 | 1.104 | 52.0% | -95 | +168 | — | 53.1% | +0.16 | 3–4 (43%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.11 |
| 22 | 2025 | 1876 | 156.8 | +2.63 | +3.27 | 1.114 | 52.2% | -27 | -153 | -7 | 57.4% | +0.41 | 4–8 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | 97.7 | -2.21 | 2020 | 1672 | 133.5 | +0.65 | +1.84 | 1.092 | 51.6% | -40 | +83 | — | 51.1% | +0.29 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.20 |
| 23 | 2026 | 1834 | 130.1 | +0.91 | +3.09 | 1.174 | 53.4% | -25 | — | +99 | 55.8% | +0.40 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.6 | +1.17 | 2021 | 1777 | 147.8 | +1.29 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +25 | -71 | — | 54.4% | +0.13 | 7–7 (50%) | 4–4 (50%) | 101.0 | -0.26 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1694 | 140.7 | -0.18 | +0.52 | 0.976 | 49.5% | -3 | +179 | -208 | 49.4% | +0.03 | 5–6 (45%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.6 | -0.06 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1626 | 126.4 | -0.88 | -1.70 | 0.908 | 48.0% | +59 | +76 | -120 | 40.9% | -0.68 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–4 (33%) | 90.9 | +0.06 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1617 | 107.3 | -1.72 | +1.68 | 1.072 | 51.5% | -24 | — | — | 55.6% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1648 | 117.6 | -2.75 | -3.33 | 0.712 | 42.6% | +30 | +36 | — | 44.7% | -0.79 | 3–1 (75%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.4 | -0.29 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1708 | 124.4 | +0.10 | +2.08 | 1.042 | 51.0% | — | +59 | — | 70.6% | +0.94 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 1950 | 150.9 | +1.66 | +2.25 | 1.102 | 52.0% | -22 | -160 | -9 | 58.0% | +0.56 | 15–24 (38%) | 22–18 (55%) | 97.0 | -0.39 | — | 1883 | 134.4 | +0.29 | +0.25 | 0.986 | 49.7% | +5 | +91 | -158 | 49.2% | -0.12 | 24–35 (41%) | 23–29 (44%) | 92.9 | -0.64 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Jil Teichmann
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorana Cirstea | 3 | 1 | 4 | Aug 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 2 | 2 | 4 | Apr 16, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 17, 2022 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 11, 2022 | H2H |
| Karolina Muchova | 2 | 1 | 3 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |