H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Eugenie Bouchard vs Na Li H2H: 0-2

Na Li holds a 2–0 lead over Eugenie Bouchard in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Na Li leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Na Li won the 2014 Australian Open semifinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eugenie Bouchard
Canada Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Na Li
CHN Age 44 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Na Li #4 6-2 6-4 Eugenie Bouchard #31 Match data Jan 26, 2014* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Na Li #11 6-4 6-4 Eugenie Bouchard #237 Match data Aug 9, 2012* R32 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eugenie Bouchard #1,002 #5 4,793 1,927 158 147 51.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Na Li #9 #2 7,585 2,117 338 159 68.0% 2 1 0 1 5 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Na Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #305 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 5–4 55.6% #147 1,546 0 0 2000 1–3 25.0% #136 1,496 0 0
19 2013 25–17 59.5% #32 1,751 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #302 1,480 0 0
20 2014 39–23 62.9% #7 1,862 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2015 12–17 41.4% #49 1,701 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2016 29–24 54.7% #46 1,697 0 1 2004 6–1 85.7% #78 1,599 0 1
23 2017 11–20 35.5% #81 1,601 0 1 2005 23–14 62.2% #56 1,710 0 1
24 2018 11–13 45.8% #87 1,670 0 1 2006 36–22 62.1% #21 1,818 0 1
25 2019 4–10 28.6% #215 1,617 0 1 2007 22–12 64.7% #29 1,819 0 1
26 2020 10–4 71.4% #141 1,713 0 1 2008 28–14 66.7% #23 1,863 0 2
27 2021 4–3 57.1% #253 1,704 0 1 2009 35–17 67.3% #15 1,938 0 2
28 2022 3–5 37.5% #326 1,632 0 1 2010 36–20 64.3% #11 1,849 0 3
29 2023 3–3 50.0% #287 1,637 0 1 2011 33–17 66.0% #5 1,862 1 5
30 — — — — — — — 2012 43–17 71.7% #7 1,999 1 6
31 2025 1–1 50.0% — 1,610 0 1 2013 46–14 76.7% #3 2,067 1 7
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–7 80.6% #9 2,024 2 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Na Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 15 11 26 57.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 18 16 34 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 20 16 36 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2004 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2005 16 12 28 57.1% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
24 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 5 18 72.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — 2008 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2022 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
29 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 16 12 28 57.1% 15 3 18 83.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 30 10 40 75.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2025 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 35 8 43 81.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 22 3 25 88.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 98 101 199 49.2% 45 29 74 60.8% 15 17 32 46.9% — — — — — 222 104 326 68.1% 77 33 110 70.0% 37 18 55 67.3% 2 4 6 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 282/306 of Eugenie Bouchard's and 372/485 of Na Li's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Na Li
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 2.0 2.5 64.1% 64.4% 38.1% 59.9% 56.7% 54.8% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 9/9 3.7 3.1 58.4% 66.2% 47.0% 58.4% 39.6% 58.4% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 34/42 2.3 2.6 56.8% 64.2% 47.1% 51.2% 44.0% 56.7% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 57/62 2.6 3.1 60.4% 66.0% 47.6% 54.0% 50.3% 58.5% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 25/29 1.7 4.0 60.1% 62.4% 47.7% 49.2% 48.0% 56.8% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 50/54 2.3 3.2 60.4% 63.6% 48.8% 50.2% 45.9% 57.8% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2017 28/31 2.3 3.5 58.3% 58.7% 45.0% 49.3% 48.3% 53.0% 42.7% 2005 2/37 1.5 3.5 71.4% 54.3% 62.6% 49.2% 41.7% 56.3% 43.6%
24 2018 24/24 3.0 3.6 59.2% 63.1% 44.0% 57.2% 46.4% 55.5% 44.2% 2006 36/58 1.9 2.3 71.1% 61.5% 49.3% 51.6% 50.5% 57.6% 45.2%
25 2019 14/14 1.3 4.0 60.7% 60.7% 42.3% 50.0% 54.0% 53.3% 42.9% 2007 33/34 1.5 2.0 71.5% 62.4% 51.9% 52.6% 45.7% 59.2% 46.2%
26 2020 14/14 2.8 1.8 65.5% 65.3% 49.8% 61.5% 49.6% 59.8% 45.5% 2008 32/42 2.2 3.9 66.3% 63.4% 48.3% 58.5% 51.1% 58.2% 46.8%
27 2021 7/7 2.7 2.9 62.7% 65.2% 45.7% 49.6% 50.9% 57.9% 46.8% 2009 47/52 2.1 2.9 63.9% 65.4% 51.1% 45.7% 50.4% 59.9% 46.1%
28 2022 8/8 2.8 1.5 57.0% 61.4% 51.7% 60.8% 45.3% 57.3% 42.6% 2010 48/56 2.3 2.9 68.5% 65.7% 49.2% 50.4% 51.7% 60.4% 47.3%
29 2023 6/6 2.3 1.7 66.8% 62.6% 52.8% 41.7% 51.9% 59.0% 43.5% 2011 39/50 2.1 3.2 69.1% 64.4% 47.3% 54.6% 51.5% 59.1% 45.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 49/60 2.3 3.0 68.7% 65.1% 53.5% 57.5% 51.0% 61.2% 47.8%
31 2025 2/2 1.0 2.0 62.0% 59.5% 47.9% 54.2% 37.4% 55.1% 41.8% 2013 52/60 2.8 4.2 63.2% 67.9% 49.4% 58.5% 57.2% 61.0% 49.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 34/36 1.9 4.0 66.5% 66.3% 49.7% 55.6% 57.2% 60.8% 50.0%
Career — 282/306 2.4 3.1 60.0% 63.5% 47.1% 52.6% 47.7% 56.9% 44.5% — 372/497 2.2 3.2 67.4% 64.9% 50.1% 53.8% 51.9% 59.9% 47.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Na Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1493 102.7 -1.04 -2.27 0.773 45.8% +18 — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1546 114.3 +1.12 -0.43 1.033 50.7% +7 — — 52.4% +0.38 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18 2000 1497 107.1 — — — — +34 — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — -0.21
19 2013 1752 141.5 +1.07 +2.65 1.074 51.5% -37 -74 -156 58.2% +0.47 7–9 (44%) 8–1 (89%) 106.1 -1.18 2001 1481 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
20 2014 1863 150.8 +2.70 +3.29 1.122 52.4% -96 +19 -107 61.4% +0.82 10–8 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 104.2 -1.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 1702 123.0 -1.20 +0.51 0.961 49.3% +34 +67 -27 50.0% -0.02 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 94.8 +1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2016 1697 133.5 +1.68 +1.09 1.060 51.1% -16 +85 -6 54.6% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 -1.41 2004 1600 125.7 — — — — +18 — — 81.3% +1.81 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
23 2017 1602 127.4 -1.89 -0.77 0.909 47.9% -17 +221 +25 40.3% -0.82 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.2 -0.95 2005 1711 139.1 -0.18 +0.14 0.999 49.8% -25 -56 — 61.4% +1.04 8–5 (62%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -0.97
24 2018 1670 127.3 -0.75 +1.08 0.994 49.8% -14 +151 — 42.2% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 106.6 +0.16 2006 1819 148.7 +1.65 +1.60 1.068 51.4% -79 -12 -62 61.2% +1.05 9–4 (69%) 7–4 (64%) 111.4 -2.52
25 2019 1617 127.0 -1.49 -0.31 0.919 47.9% +26 — — 38.2% -0.62 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.76 2007 1820 150.2 +2.75 +2.06 1.133 52.7% +69 -38 -48 62.2% +0.96 7–7 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.95
26 2020 1713 127.8 +1.82 +1.44 1.130 52.7% -64 +114 — 65.7% +1.00 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 +0.41 2008 1864 153.7 +2.74 +2.93 1.119 52.6% +37 — -127 60.4% +0.83 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 103.2 -1.80
27 2021 1704 112.6 +0.44 +0.05 1.114 52.1% -53 — — 53.3% +0.40 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.45 2009 1938 153.8 +4.35 +2.54 1.150 52.7% +49 -152 -127 64.9% +1.04 10–6 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 103.4 -2.23
28 2022 1633 117.1 +0.22 +0.59 0.998 50.2% -38 — — 52.9% +0.18 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.2 +0.57 2010 1850 150.5 +4.51 +3.61 1.195 53.7% -23 -4 +91 64.3% +1.23 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +0.93
29 2023 1637 118.3 +0.17 -0.98 1.060 51.3% — +151 — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +1.03 2011 1862 151.3 +3.52 +2.62 1.106 52.2% -57 +131 +42 62.8% +0.61 8–7 (53%) 9–6 (60%) 102.8 -0.26
30 2024 1618 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2000 162.2 +5.42 +5.11 1.234 54.2% -1 -5 -158 68.1% +1.30 11–10 (52%) 6–4 (60%) 100.7 0.00
31 2025 1611 113.9 +1.04 -0.76 0.931 48.7% — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — 0.00 2013 2067 165.5 +5.56 +6.05 1.265 55.0% +56 -126 -177 72.1% +1.64 8–5 (62%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -2.68
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2024 155.9 +4.17 +5.37 1.275 55.5% +114 -110 -151 75.0% +1.82 6–4 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 +0.97
Career — 1927 140.4 +0.68 +1.24 1.032 50.6% -27 +65 -55 53.1% +0.19 43–57 (43%) 45–29 (61%) 102.0 -0.43 — 2117 160.4 +4.01 +3.66 1.175 53.4% +13 -21 -66 65.1% +1.13 89–64 (58%) 61–48 (56%) 106.5 -1.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.