H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Eugenie Bouchard vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 2-1
Eugenie Bouchard holds a 2–1 lead over Yaroslava Shvedova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eugenie Bouchard leads 2–0 on clay, while Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2015 's Hertogenbosch third round 6-4 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Eugenie Bouchard | Match data |
| May 24, 2014* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Eugenie Bouchard | 7-6(3) 7-6(6) | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
| May 2, 2014* | Oeiras | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Eugenie Bouchard | 6-4 6-2 | Yaroslava Shvedova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eugenie Bouchard | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |