H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Fiona Ferro vs Teliana Pereira H2H: 0-1
Teliana Pereira holds a 1–0 lead over Fiona Ferro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Teliana Pereira leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Teliana Pereira won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 37
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Teliana Pereira | 6-3 6-2 | Fiona Ferro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiona Ferro | #189 | #39 | 1,649 | 1,799 | 55 | 72 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Teliana Pereira | #1,102 | #43 | 1,136 | 1,643 | 30 | 46 | 39.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fiona Ferro | Teliana Pereira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #102 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #42 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #411 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #46 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #206 | 1,478 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #357 | 1,454 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |