H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 3-0
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 3–0 lead over Dominika Cibulkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2016 Miami second round 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 37
Right-Handed
161 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-7(3) 6-3 7-5 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2014* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2013* | 's Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-4 6-4 | Dominika Cibulkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Dominika Cibulkova | #315 | #4 | 5,245 | 1,966 | 365 | 261 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Dominika Cibulkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #19 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #28 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 | 2011 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #18 | 1,893 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2013 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #23 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 | 2014 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,721 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 | 2015 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,757 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 | 2016 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 | 2017 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 | 2018 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,865 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,764 | 0 | 8 |