H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 2-2
Garbiñe Muguruza and Jelena Jankovic are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2016 Wuhan third round 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2016* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-4 7-6(2) | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2015* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-3 6-1 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2014* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| May 30, 2013* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jelena Jankovic | 6-3 6-0 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |