H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Garbiñe Muguruza vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 3-1
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 3–1 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2020 Australian Open fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2020* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-3 6-3 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2019* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Jan 11, 2018* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-3 7-6(6) | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2012* | Fes | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 6-4 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Garbiñe Muguruza | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |