H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Garbiñe Muguruza vs Kimiko Date H2H: 0-1

Kimiko Date holds a 1–0 lead over Garbiñe Muguruza in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimiko Date leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2014 Pattaya round of 32 6-7(2) 7-5 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Garbiñe Muguruza
ESP Age 32 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kimiko Date
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimiko Date #105 6-7(2) 7-5 7-6(6) Garbiñe Muguruza #35 Match data Jan 30, 2014* R32 Pattaya International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Garbiñe Muguruza #1,129 #1 6,766 2,061 312 182 63.2% 2 3 1 1 3 10
Kimiko Date #1,191 #4 1,280 2,092 245 190 56.3% 0 1 0 2 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Garbiñe Muguruza Kimiko Date
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2012 6–8 42.9% #109 1,543 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% #119 1,563 0 0
19 2013 14–12 53.8% #63 1,668 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% #79 1,665 0 0
20 2014 38–22 63.3% #20 1,824 0 1 1991 12–11 52.2% #32 1,724 0 0
21 2015 39–19 67.2% #3 1,954 0 2 1992 27–14 65.9% #21 1,853 0 1
22 2016 31–20 60.8% #7 1,842 1 3 1993 25–11 69.4% #13 1,947 0 2
23 2017 46–20 69.7% #2 1,935 2 5 1994 32–12 72.7% #9 1,985 0 4
24 2018 36–20 64.3% #18 1,841 2 6 1995 39–12 76.5% #4 2,029 0 5
25 2019 22–15 59.5% #36 1,817 2 7 1996 34–14 70.8% #8 2,077 0 7
26 2020 23–8 74.2% #15 1,941 2 7 — — — — — — —
27 2021 45–17 72.6% #3 2,005 2 10 — — — — — — —
28 2022 12–17 41.4% #55 1,777 2 10 — — — — — — —
29 2023 0–4 0.0% #1081 1,724 2 10 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #189 2,048 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% #69 1,845 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% #51 1,823 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% #87 1,570 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% #99 1,456 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% #75 1,576 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% #90 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% #182 1,573 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #1191 1,564 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Garbiñe Muguruza Kimiko Date
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2013 8 6 14 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1990 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2014 27 16 43 62.8% 9 4 13 69.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1991 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2015 25 12 37 67.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
22 2016 18 15 33 54.5% 12 3 15 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1993 18 6 24 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2017 30 14 44 68.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 1994 26 5 31 83.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2018 27 14 41 65.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1995 16 6 22 72.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
25 2019 17 11 28 60.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 25 8 33 75.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2020 17 6 23 73.9% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 38 12 50 76.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 17 15 32 53.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 4 16 20 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 11 13 15.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 219 124 343 63.8% 62 38 100 62.0% 31 20 51 60.8% — — — — — 170 127 297 57.2% 24 27 51 47.1% 31 24 55 56.4% 20 12 32 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Garbiñe Muguruza Kimiko Date
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2012 1544 125.0 -2.60 +1.47 0.911 47.7% +21 +39 — 41.9% -1.00 2–5 (29%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.84 1989 1563 118.2 — — — — -9 — +53 48.0% +0.24 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +1.20
19 2013 1668 132.8 +1.86 -0.67 0.985 49.8% +14 -103 -50 50.0% 0.00 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.1 -0.45 1990 1665 128.2 — — — — -15 — — 57.1% +0.40 1–0 3–2 (60%) — -0.03
20 2014 1825 147.6 +1.31 +2.74 1.098 52.1% 0 -119 -189 60.6% +0.77 14–12 (54%) 8–10 (44%) 100.4 +1.40 1991 1725 132.7 — — — — -22 — -81 52.7% +0.15 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 +0.73
21 2015 1955 154.4 +4.18 +3.29 1.158 52.8% -22 -210 -174 64.0% +1.17 15–9 (63%) 6–7 (46%) 104.4 -0.93 1992 1854 155.6 — — — — +53 -237 -209 60.9% +0.92 8–2 (80%) 1–5 (17%) 104.6 -0.72
22 2016 1843 151.6 +4.62 +2.60 1.182 53.4% -21 +95 -105 62.0% +0.95 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) 96.5 +0.58 1993 1948 158.1 — — — — +75 -344 — 62.8% +1.00 7–1 (88%) 4–3 (57%) 105.3 -0.46
23 2017 1936 156.1 +3.62 +3.80 1.147 52.7% -31 +10 +25 67.1% +1.16 15–6 (71%) 4–7 (36%) 102.0 +0.32 1994 1985 161.2 — — — — +87 -347 -333 67.0% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 -0.33
24 2018 1842 150.6 +3.92 +3.48 1.201 53.7% +21 +112 +57 64.1% +1.15 6–9 (40%) 4–7 (36%) 90.5 +1.77 1995 2030 160.2 — — — — +41 -192 -291 71.6% +1.43 11–5 (69%) 6–1 (86%) 104.6 -2.22
25 2019 1817 147.5 +1.58 +1.77 1.069 51.5% +43 +148 — 59.5% +0.59 6–5 (55%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -0.88 1996 2077 165.2 — — — — +20 -248 -187 65.8% +1.32 11–9 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -0.42
26 2020 1942 154.8 +3.52 +2.81 1.175 53.2% +5 +66 — 68.0% +0.99 10–5 (67%) 7–0 (100%) 107.2 -1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2021 2005 165.3 +5.49 +5.23 1.258 54.6% +43 -24 -63 69.7% +1.39 8–8 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 98.7 -1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2022 1777 136.0 +0.43 -1.32 0.949 49.1% +119 +89 +63 47.6% -0.13 1–6 (14%) 5–3 (63%) 93.1 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2023 1725 118.4 -0.07 -0.78 0.766 44.7% +101 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–2 — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2049 101.3 +0.44 -0.26 0.663 40.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 123.3 -0.97 +0.28 0.931 48.6% +25 — — 44.4% -0.38 3–8 (27%) 2–3 (40%) 87.7 -0.84
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1823 145.4 -0.25 +1.83 0.998 49.9% +18 -46 — 51.8% -0.11 11–8 (58%) 9–2 (82%) 107.5 -3.09
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1571 117.6 -2.22 +0.23 0.876 46.9% +27 +117 +226 27.3% -1.21 0–4 (0%) 3–10 (23%) 88.8 -2.48
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1457 113.8 -2.85 -1.69 0.875 47.1% +33 — — 20.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.10
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 135.2 -1.65 +2.04 0.997 50.0% +7 — +183 46.4% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 93.6 -0.50
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1597 125.2 -1.57 -0.21 0.942 48.7% -18 — +178 50.8% -0.15 5–8 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 97.7 -0.26
44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1574 113.0 -2.60 -0.62 0.817 46.3% -2 — — 35.0% -0.65 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1564 90.3 +0.60 +0.07 0.246 20.3% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.16
Career — 2062 158.1 +3.08 +2.71 1.124 52.4% +13 +6 -55 61.6% +0.84 91–76 (54%) 52–58 (47%) 97.0 -0.13 — 2093 154.4 -1.51 +0.62 0.928 48.3% +30 -185 -61 55.2% +0.45 77–65 (54%) 42–48 (47%) 95.3 -2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.